<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Brad Garland.net</title><link>http://www.bradgarland.net</link><description>Hello and welcome. This is the personal musings of Brad Garland, who lives in Dallas, TX.  Feel free to take a look around...</description><language>en</language><generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator><geo:lat>33.212203</geo:lat><geo:long>-96.675226</geo:long><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/</creativeCommons:license><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/bradgarland" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Do you know when you’re a Digital Native?</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/453977812/</link><category>All things Tech</category><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Ideas</category><category>digital immigrants</category><category>digital natives</category><category>generation x</category><category>generation y</category><category>generations</category><category>grown up digital</category><category>millenials</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 07:15:10 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=605</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><img width="500" height="417" src="http://danielisadoreberman.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/gen_y_04__001094_copy.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>When it&#8217;s not a digital camera, it&#8217;s just a camera&#8230;</p>
<p>When it&#8217;s not a cell phone, it&#8217;s just a phone&#8230;</p>
<p>And when you don&#8217;t call them your &#8220;Facebook/Twitter/Banktastic friends&#8221;, they&#8217;re just your friends&#8230;</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=6PFxN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=6PFxN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=OJvJn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=OJvJn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>When it&amp;#8217;s not a digital camera, it&amp;#8217;s just a camera&amp;#8230;
When it&amp;#8217;s not a cell phone, it&amp;#8217;s just a phone&amp;#8230;
And when you don&amp;#8217;t call them your &amp;#8220;Facebook/Twitter/Banktastic friends&amp;#8221;, they&amp;#8217;re just your friends&amp;#8230;</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/15/do-you-know-when-youre-a-digital-native/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/15/do-you-know-when-youre-a-digital-native/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A company with a purpose</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/451414387/</link><category>Business</category><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Fun Stuff</category><category>Ideas</category><category>company</category><category>goals</category><category>purpose</category><category>shared beliefs</category><category>small business</category><category>The Garland Group</category><category>thegarlandgroup</category><category>vision</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:22:57 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=593</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>At least once a year I like to go through a what I&#8217;m calling a &#8216;<strong>State of the company</strong>&#8216; review that answers questions as if we are starting <a href="http://thegarlandgroup.net">this company</a> from anew.  It should be noted that what I try to avoid is being generic. Avoiding those scenarios like meaningless, adjective-heavy mission statements and over generalized goals that don&#8217;t &#8220;walk the walk&#8221;.  If we don&#8217;t take these values with us and live and breathe them, what&#8217;s the point? And beyond all that, <strong>I want a company that stands for something.</strong>  It is a wonderful exercise that brings what we do back to its roots and I&#8217;d like to share with you guys what I&#8217;ve been working on. </p>
<h2>What kind of company do you want to build?</h2>
<p>Our company is expanding in both services and people.  We are getting into <a href="http://banktastic.com">software</a> <a href="http://riskkey.com">development</a> now and want to provide the same high level of software services as consulting services do today.  If we look at everything we do (technology audits, risk assessments, security testing, community platforms) all of these services common denominator is rooted in education.  Our services provide more of a coaching experience than the judging people or organizations. So our vision/mantra/belief is all tied together in the phrase, </p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Service through education.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s short and sweet but with meaning.  Everything we do ties back to this mantra.</p>
<h2>What are our shared goals that everyone in the company exudes?</h2>
<p>Next step is establishing through every single person in our company what we belief in.  I see this as a &#8217;sales-side&#8217; of the company.  Not from the getting deals standpoint but from the &#8216;this is how we&#8217;re built&#8217; standpoint.  To say it in another way, it&#8217;s our Commandments. </p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Quality service regardless of client</strong> - We treat everyone, regardless of size of organization, the same way.</li>
<li><strong>‘Our word’ should mean something</strong> - Many people today don&#8217;t let a handshake or a verbal promise be a commitment to something, we do.</li>
<li><strong>Honest but realistic</strong> - We want to shoot people straight but also temper it with realistic expectations due to their situation.</li>
<li><strong>Give openly</strong> - We want to better this world so giving openly will always open more doors than close them.</li>
<li><strong>It’s not what ‘I’ accomplish, it what ‘we’ accomplish</strong> - We know this isn&#8217;t all about us, this is about the success of our clients and their customers.</li>
<li><strong>Success is defined by happiness, not $$$ </strong>- I&#8217;m most proud of this one.  We define success based off of our clients and employees happiness, not by the size of the paychecks. This is why <a href="http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/01/rockin-the-rowe/">ROWE thinking</a> excites me so!</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m in the middle of this exercise and have started at the company level and I&#8217;m now working on the business levels and then down to the product level (then lastly, people level).  Each level down gets easier due to the foundation the previous level left before it.  I&#8217;d would LOVE to hear your feedback to this and how you are helping your company become a world class organization.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=IulHN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=IulHN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=cWT0n"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=cWT0n" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>At least once a year I like to go through a what I&amp;#8217;m calling a &amp;#8216;State of the company&amp;#8216; review that answers questions as if we are starting this company from anew.  It should be noted that what I try to avoid is being generic. Avoiding those scenarios like meaningless, adjective-heavy mission statements and [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/12/a-company-with-a-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/12/a-company-with-a-purpose/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>2008 voter turnout details emerging</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/450197808/</link><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Fun Stuff</category><category>Gastric Bypass</category><category>Ideas</category><category>2008</category><category>election</category><category>goldwater</category><category>johnson</category><category>kennedy</category><category>mccain</category><category>nixon</category><category>obama</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category><category>presidential</category><category>vote</category><category>voter turnout</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:21:31 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=576</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>The details are finally emerging about the voter turnout for the presidential election as districts finally are able to close the polls (by now counting absentee&#8217;s votes).  In what many thought would be the biggest election turnout in history actually didn&#8217;t get the turnout expected.  I was particularly interested from a generational breakdown perspective how it turned out.  Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve found thus far.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i34ao3tow5yhj2v7v24HM_wbT8JQD948LJRG0">couple</a> <a href="http://www.mlive.com/us-politics/index.ssf/2008/11/that_huge_voter_turnout_didnt.html">sources</a> are indicating that although the voting was higher than the 2004 election, it is only barely so.  The <strong>2004 election brought in 60.6%</strong> of those eligible whereas <strong>the 2008 election was between 60.7 and 61.7%</strong>.  Still an increase from previous elections but not the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13798.html">massive numbers some predicted</a> and it still wasn&#8217;t enough to beat the two highest election turnouts which occurred in 1960 (Nixon/Kennedy) and 1964 (Johnson/Goldwater).</p>
<p>Here is a graph of the voter turnouts since 1948:<br />
<img src="http://elections.gmu.edu/images/turnout.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>In regards to 2008, when you drill down into the demographics you notice that there was definitely a large youth contingent, that swayed Democratic, this election.  <strong>The initial consensus is that Republicans chose not to show up this year.</strong>  This could have been due to people believing this election was the Democratics to lose or a belief that a change was indeed needed (<em>but I speculate at this point</em>).</p>
<p>If you look at <a href="http://img.skitch.com/20081112-tkw24kx5jf3713eqaiikkc41tf.png" rel="lightbox[576]">this chart</a> you can definitely see the more Republican states have lower turnout ratings than years before.  I still haven&#8217;t seen a good breakdown from an age standpoint but it seems those numbers won&#8217;t truly come out until the new census is conducted next year.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=kqBaN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=kqBaN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=8bdHn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=8bdHn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>The details are finally emerging about the voter turnout for the presidential election as districts finally are able to close the polls (by now counting absentee&amp;#8217;s votes).  In what many thought would be the biggest election turnout in history actually didn&amp;#8217;t get the turnout expected.  I was particularly interested from a generational breakdown [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/11/2008-voter-turnout-details-emerging/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/11/2008-voter-turnout-details-emerging/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A CEO’s salary measures success?</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/448469596/</link><category>Business</category><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Ideas</category><category>entrepreneur</category><category>goals</category><category>ownership</category><category>team</category><category>values</category><category>vision</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:52:52 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=564</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>This weekend I was watching some of the <a href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/2008/conference/video.php">Techcrunch50 video coverage</a> and came across some interesting discussion between Peter Thiel and Mike Arrington.  They batted around some different topics but one I found particularly interesting was the discussion of a startup Theil is invested in that is tracking startups metrics for VCs (follow that?) and one measurement they&#8217;ve found thus far is depending upon a CEO&#8217;s pay can sometimes show the success of the company and I could see this being the case for small business as well potentially. Here&#8217;s that segment of video:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="437" height="310" id="viddler_8907fd00"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/simple/8907fd00/" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.viddler.com/simple/8907fd00/" width="437" height="310" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" name="viddler_8907fd00" ></embed></object></p>
<p>The first point is strictly investment driven and CEO aligning with the equity investors but it&#8217;s the second and third points that I see better translated into the small or startup business.</p>
<h3>CEO&#8217;s salary puts a cap on the level everyone else gets paid</h3>
<p>This is pretty easy yet interesting assessment but isn&#8217;t always apparent to the small business. If we fall into the traditional business mindset of the &#8216;CEO should make the most money&#8217; than everyone else&#8217;s salary is directly proportional to that.  I translate that this into thinking the CEO compensation as more of a sales role by which its looked at as &#8216;commission&#8217; based or more realistically &#8217;stock&#8217; based instead of hierarchically based. Examples of this are Google founders <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/05/news/companies/google_salaries/index.htm">Sergei Brynn and Larry Page&#8217;s $1 dollar salaries</a>.  I can appreciate this model as the focus turns more on what is best for the company rather than the person at the top of the organization.</p>
<h3>Building something people believe in</h3>
<p>Like Thiel mentioned, this is the more important point.  I am going through a recurring process for me of questioning the vision, the shared values of the team, and goals for our company.  I do this about once a year (assuming no major shifts to strategy) to ensure we are heading in the right direction.  I think it&#8217;s an important process to go through as I break it down at the company level, business level, and product levels.  I want, as I think many small business owners, to ensure our people have an understand of where we&#8217;re going and that the entire organization is marching to the same drum.  Does your company do this? Is there something that is missing?</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=ErfyN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=ErfyN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=Diy3n"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=Diy3n" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>This weekend I was watching some of the Techcrunch50 video coverage and came across some interesting discussion between Peter Thiel and Mike Arrington.  They batted around some different topics but one I found particularly interesting was the discussion of a startup Theil is invested in that is tracking startups metrics for VCs (follow that?) [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/10/a-ceos-salary-measures-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/10/a-ceos-salary-measures-success/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Opportunity Lost - to be on a Board of Directors</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/445530322/</link><category>Banking</category><category>Business</category><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Fun Stuff</category><category>board of directors</category><category>bod</category><category>management</category><category>oversight</category><category>strategy</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:34:36 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=535</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>The above picture is what the vast majority of Boards (especially FI boards) look like today.  White, male, over-50.  <strong>That&#8217;s a problem.</strong>  How do you expect some perspective with a board like that? How can you expect to cater to upcoming generations?</p>
<p>With that being said, I have recently been looking around for a board to be on for either a bank or a credit union.  I didn&#8217;t care which as long as it was a place I could make a difference and the institution wanted my feedback (for better or worse).</p>
<p>To my surprise, I was offered that opportunity a month ago by a credit union that was small but growing and wanting to take a chance on me.  <strong>I&#8217;m humbled by that.</strong>  Needless to say, I was excited and to ensure proper consideration was done my last hurdle was my clients.  I didn&#8217;t want to do anything that hurt our relationship so I sent out this email to my top 10 clients asking them for their opinions:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hi XXXXX,</p>
<p>I wanted to take a couple minutes of your time to ask an important question for you as a client of The Garland Group.  I have been positioning lately to get on a Board of Directors (for either a bank or credit union) to help an institution grow its member base by helping them understanding the strategies of Web usage and the affinity the Gen X/Y&#8217;s of the world have for it and expect from the bank or CU.  Boards are inherently older and out of touch with a lot of these issues and I want to be that &#8216;fresh blood&#8217; for them.</p>
<p>With that said, I&#8217;m curious if you would have any problems with me being on a bank or credit union board at all?  I would put a line in the sand and not offer our compliance services to them but I wanted to see if you, as a client of ours, had any issue with it? I wanted to approach you open and honestly and would hope for the same candor in return.  Thanks for your opinion in regards to this, let me know when you can!</p></blockquote>
<p>Some responded by saying things like &#8220;That&#8217;s your business, go for it!&#8221; but the majority had an issue with it.  And I can understand their viewpoint.  Their concern was that I would no longer have an unbiased, objective opinion and that it could hindered what services we currently offer them and they could no longer be a client of ours.  Again, I understand their viewpoint so I, unfortunately, had to turn the position down.</p>
<p>I hope to find some other boards, in other areas, that I could be of use as I believe we still have the same problem no matter the industry.  So as I continue my search if you are looking to put your mark on a Board, holler at me, I&#8217;d love to be able to help you.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=hRaBN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=hRaBN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=8bZ0n"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=8bZ0n" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>The above picture is what the vast majority of Boards (especially FI boards) look like today.  White, male, over-50.  That&amp;#8217;s a problem.  How do you expect some perspective with a board like that? How can you expect to cater to upcoming generations?
With that being said, I have recently been looking around for [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/07/opportunity-lost-to-be-on-a-board-of-directors/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/07/opportunity-lost-to-be-on-a-board-of-directors/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Speaking Evaluations - What’s the value?</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/444451182/</link><category>Banking</category><category>Business</category><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Fun Stuff</category><category>critiques</category><category>education</category><category>presentations</category><category>presenting</category><category>reviews</category><category>speaking</category><category>speeches</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:14:44 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=525</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>As a burgeoning speaker, the evaluation process, is probably the best way I know to grade yourself on how you&#8217;ve done (other than someone telling you personally or even better, referrals).  I appreciate the organizers that do them because I&#8217;m always looking to get better but you definitely have to take them with a grain of salt.  Here&#8217;s what I mean.</p>
<p>These are the comments from a recent presentation I did on Generation Y in August:</p>
<blockquote><p>Nice slide handout format!  They&#8217;re readable!</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Excellent speaker - bring back next year!</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Brad is real good at explaining this issue/concept to board directors (older).  He can talk to all generations.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The information is completely outside the reality of our work environment.  If Gen Y as presented in this session comes to pass, the world is in real trouble.  No Gen Y&#8217;er as represented in this presentation would ever survive in our work environment much less have a practical chance to be hired.  Example:  Look at the speaker info sheet - ther are at least 7 basic grammatical errors on the sheet.  Unsatisfactory!</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Did not involve the audience.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Wonderful!</p></blockquote>
<p>Now I understand that I&#8217;m the type to diminish the good and amplify the bad but, that&#8217;s a me thing.  My point here is that there is no grey in these comments.  Some love what you do, some don&#8217;t.  Some don&#8217;t mind <strong>you</strong> but hate the topic or content.  So all you can do is take their comments in stride, learn from them, and move on.  I really appreciate anyone that is willing to comment, both good and bad on my talks, it can make me and you better as speakers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go check my <a href="http://www.bradgarland.net/mint/pepper/orderedlist/downloads/download.php?file=http%3A//www.bradgarland.net/mint/pepper/orderedlist/downloads/download.php%3Ffile%3Dhttp%253A//www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/brads-speaking-topics-bio.pdf">speaker info sheet</a> now. <img src='http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=y8lkN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=y8lkN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=5rGQn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=5rGQn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>As a burgeoning speaker, the evaluation process, is probably the best way I know to grade yourself on how you&amp;#8217;ve done (other than someone telling you personally or even better, referrals).  I appreciate the organizers that do them because I&amp;#8217;m always looking to get better but you definitely have to take them with a [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/06/speaking-evaluations-whats-the-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss><enclosure url="http://www.bradgarland.net/mint/pepper/orderedlist/downloads/download.php?file=http%3A//www.bradgarland.net/mint/pepper/orderedlist/downloads/download.php%3Ffile%3Dhttp%253A//www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/brads-speaking-topics-bio.pdf" length="323141" type="application/pdf" /><media:content url="http://www.bradgarland.net/mint/pepper/orderedlist/downloads/download.php?file=http%3A//www.bradgarland.net/mint/pepper/orderedlist/downloads/download.php%3Ffile%3Dhttp%253A//www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/brads-speaking-topics-bio.pdf" fileSize="323141" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/06/speaking-evaluations-whats-the-value/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Thoughts from Election Night 2008</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/443299818/</link><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Fun Stuff</category><category>Gastric Bypass</category><category>Ideas</category><category>2008</category><category>biden</category><category>cnn</category><category>election</category><category>fox</category><category>mccain</category><category>msnbc</category><category>obama</category><category>palin</category><category>president</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:51:04 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=539</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wow.</strong> America (and the world) was witness to seismic shift in perspective and the evolution of what our country has become last night.  Last night felt more like a Superbowl watching party than a standard election night coverage.  I wanted to post some of my takeaways from the night:</p>
<ul>
<li> I was following <a href="http://cnn.com">CNN</a>, <a href="http://foxnews.com">Fox</a>, and <a href="http://msnbc.com">MSNBC</a> most of the time.  I think CNN had the best coverage for me as far as the technologies they were leveraging to provide insight to the <a rel=lightbox title="Touchscreen goodness" href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/images/2008/02/06/john_king_on_cnn_primary_election_c.jpg" rel="lightbox[539]">county-by-county breakdown</a> between this race and the 2004 election.  They also did some <a rel=lightbox title="Princess Leia CNN style" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3228/3004307730_68f689a2e8_b_d.jpg" rel="lightbox[539]">hologram stuff</a> which was cool but some considered a bit creepy too. I also watched some of the live joint <a href="http://www.indecision2008.com/">Jon Stewart &#038; Stephen Colbert &#8216;Indecision 08&#8242;</a> and despite me loving that program, it didn&#8217;t do much for me last night.</li>
<li>I thought McCain&#8217;s final speech was wonderfully done and handled with respect, dignity, and grace. Many wished he would&#8217;ve done more of that in his campaign and might&#8217;ve have had another result.</li>
<li>When I saw McCain and Palin embrace at the end of his speech, I got this feeling of we will never see them in the same room again together.</li>
<li>The crowds at Grant Park in Chicago looked more like it was for a rock band than an election.  People dancing, cheering, having a good time (even before the final bell).</li>
<li>I appreciate Obama for already reaching out to those that &#8220;didn&#8217;t vote&#8221; for him and making the whole speech about &#8216;we&#8217; instead of &#8216;I&#8217; or &#8216;me&#8217;. Our country must stand united.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m still interested to see the final numbers in regards to the overall % of Americans that voted, the generational breakdowns, and how that affected the election.</li>
<li>Lastly, with Obama&#8217;s campaign having a surplus of cash, what happens to that extra cash? Would love to see a charity or even the national debt get it. Heh.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave with this image I got off of <a href="http://twitter.com/deivian">Twitter</a> today.  Even without a line of policy in place from Obama, this country has changed and I think for the better. Go America go.</p>
<p><a href="http://i33.tinypic.com/zx6yi8.jpg" rel="lightbox[539]"><img width=500 height=350 src="http://i33.tinypic.com/zx6yi8.jpg" alt="Change." /></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=UI8dN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=UI8dN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=E6PIn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=E6PIn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>Wow. America (and the world) was witness to seismic shift in perspective and the evolution of what our country has become last night.  Last night felt more like a Superbowl watching party than a standard election night coverage.  I wanted to post some of my takeaways from the night:

 I was following CNN, [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/05/thoughts-from-election-night-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/05/thoughts-from-election-night-2008/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>I Voted.</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/442143809/</link><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Ideas</category><category>presidential</category><category>vote</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:32:52 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=522</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Did you?</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/chrisandbecca/2981988771/">Photo</a> by: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/chrisandbecca/">chrisandbecca</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=4E01N"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=4E01N" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=BuSEn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=BuSEn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>Did you?
Photo by: chrisandbecca</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/04/i-voted/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/04/i-voted/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Why you should blog!</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/440981746/</link><category>Banking</category><category>Business</category><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Fun Stuff</category><category>Gastric Bypass</category><category>Ideas</category><category>amex</category><category>blog</category><category>blogging</category><category>entrepreneurial</category><category>entrepreneurs</category><category>openforum</category><category>seth godin</category><category>small business</category><category>tom peters</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:53:08 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=509</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m lucky enough to get to talk to people around the country about topics like emerging technologies like the Web, communication techniques, and how those two mix and mingle with each other in today&#8217;s business.  So I&#8217;m always trying to find new and better ways to get people to understand just what it means to do and try certain things like social networking, <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>, or even blogging.  <strong>So this time, I&#8217;m going to have people smarter than me do it.</strong></p>
<p>I think these two (<a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/">Seth Godin</a> &#038; <a href="http://www.tompeters.com">Tom Peters</a>) discuss the reasons for blogging better and more succinctly than I could and please note, these are Boomers!!!</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="477" height="317" id="viddler_b010716c"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/simple/b010716c/" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.viddler.com/simple/b010716c/" width="477" height="317" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" name="viddler_b010716c" ></embed></object></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=s6fMN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=s6fMN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=FnEDn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=FnEDn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>I&amp;#8217;m lucky enough to get to talk to people around the country about topics like emerging technologies like the Web, communication techniques, and how those two mix and mingle with each other in today&amp;#8217;s business.  So I&amp;#8217;m always trying to find new and better ways to get people to understand just what it means [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/03/why-you-should-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/03/why-you-should-blog/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Generational Communication Comparisons</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradgarland/~3/440171567/</link><category>All things Tech</category><category>Banking</category><category>Business</category><category>Day in the Life</category><category>Ideas</category><category>audio</category><category>boomers</category><category>communication</category><category>email</category><category>gen x</category><category>gen y</category><category>generations</category><category>mechanisms</category><category>mobile</category><category>oprah</category><category>skype</category><category>text</category><category>traditionalists</category><category>video</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 12:32:30 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradgarland.net/?p=493</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>I came across <a href="http://www.themarketingstudent.com/2008/06/16/a-look-at-how-gen-y-communicates/">this post</a> discussing the communication techniques of Gen Y and loved the pictures displayed. </p>
<p>Here they all are:<br />
<a rel=lightbox[comm] href="http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/baby-boomers-communication.gif" rel="lightbox[493]"><img src="http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/baby-boomers-communication.gif" alt="" title="How Boomers communicate" /></a></p>
<p><a rel=lightbox[comm] href="http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gen-x-communication.gif" rel="lightbox[493]"><img src="http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gen-x-communication.gif" alt="" title="How Gen X communicates" width="475" height="152" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-491" /></a></p>
<p><a rel=lightbox[comm] href="http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gen-y-communication.gif" rel="lightbox[493]"><img src="http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gen-y-communication.gif" alt="" title="How Gen Y communicates" width="475" height="145" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-492" /></a></p>
<p>They definitely made some pretty big assumptions here but I think the overall theme works.  I wanted to add a bit to the conversation however.</p>
<p><strong>1) Give the Boomers some credit.</strong> On the Boomers picture there is no existance of email or even a cell phone on it?  Come on&#8230;this pic might&#8217;ve have been better suited for the &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_Generation">Traditionalists</a>&#8216;.  Boomers definitely bridge the gap between this Boomer pic and the Gen X pic as most are comfortable with email and cell phones.<br />
<em>I do appreciate the subtle AOL mail icon &#038; beeper on Gen X pic though. Hehe!</em> <img src='http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>2) Communication reply differences.</strong> I&#8217;m always intrigued on how people interact with one another so I always ask people, of varying ages, why they do the things they do.  Something that I&#8217;ve come to realize is Boomers are more likely to expect a response from the place the message was originated.  If they called you, they expect a <strong>phone call</strong> back.  If they emailed, email them back!  This has shifted for future generations.  Gen X &#038; Y can flow in and out of the communications mechanisms and as long as the end result is met, it doesn&#8217;t matter how they get there.</p>
<p><strong>3) Face to face always wins but&#8230;</strong> I say it often but face to face still wins but I&#8217;m surprised in the Gen Y area there isn&#8217;t a video chat mark between phone calls and face to face.  That mechanism works well today (Hell, <a title="Oprah's on Skype now!" href="http://www.bradgarland.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/oprah_skype.jpg" rel="lightbox[493]">Oprah is using Skype</a> on her show now) and can really add to an internal meeting or a quick 5 minute interchange between co-workers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always looking for ways to be a better communicator and we all have our preferences so trying to understand why people do what they do is always an interested topic to me.  Do you agree with these pictures? What&#8217;s missing?</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=YHY6N"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=YHY6N" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?a=T3CHn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/bradgarland?i=T3CHn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded><description>I came across this post discussing the communication techniques of Gen Y and loved the pictures displayed. 
Here they all are:



They definitely made some pretty big assumptions here but I think the overall theme works.  I wanted to add a bit to the conversation however.
1) Give the Boomers some credit. On the Boomers picture [...]</description><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/02/generational-communication-comparisons/feed/</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.bradgarland.net/2008/11/02/generational-communication-comparisons/</feedburner:origLink></item><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating><feedburner:awareness>http://api.feedburner.com/awareness/1.0/GetFeedData?uri=bradgarland</feedburner:awareness></channel></rss>
